<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Putting the &#8220;Hurt&#8221; on &#8220;Avatar&#8221;: A Quick Look at the 82nd Annual Oscars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://new.blog.imdb.net/2010/03/08/putting-the-hurt-on-avatar-a-quick-look-at-the-82nd-annual-oscars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://new.blog.imdb.net/2010/03/08/putting-the-hurt-on-avatar-a-quick-look-at-the-82nd-annual-oscars/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramesh chandra</title>
		<link>http://new.blog.imdb.net/2010/03/08/putting-the-hurt-on-avatar-a-quick-look-at-the-82nd-annual-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-5551</link>
		<dc:creator>ramesh chandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.blog.imdb.net/?p=1008#comment-5551</guid>
		<description>well......the jury  might have thought to  make it bit funny by givin  away the award  to  kathryn ....rather  than his ex-hubby  who   desrved it  the most....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well&#8230;&#8230;the jury  might have thought to  make it bit funny by givin  away the award  to  kathryn &#8230;.rather  than his ex-hubby  who   desrved it  the most&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://new.blog.imdb.net/2010/03/08/putting-the-hurt-on-avatar-a-quick-look-at-the-82nd-annual-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-5474</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.blog.imdb.net/?p=1008#comment-5474</guid>
		<description>Judging is a poor substitute for appreciation. These films are stories about us. They describe you and me, whether you like it or not. They are mirrors, as all stories are. They reflect back to us not only our current situation, but some possibilities for the future. Film stories ask us to decide, not judge.

I took a film course many years ago that taught me about the eclectic nature of the film medium. Color, texture, movement, form, structure, language, music, so many elements to use in self-expression, to tell a story. Film leveled the playing ground and upped the ante, for it qualified all the criticisms directed at the other media that preceded it – literature, painting, photography, sculpture, even architecture. We want to know the truth about ourselves, want answers to our questions, want something so real and close to us that it perhaps takes less effort to solve our problems. I hope, whoever you are, you want to know more about your life, and aren’t too sure that you have all the answers. No one film does, just as no one person in your life does. You find the answers to your questions, with help. So it becomes how open a person is to possibilities, and this requires imagination.

The most salient (meaningful) comment I’ve ever read about acting is that the great actors are honest. Simply that. And regarding stories, not just through film, is that they are great when they touch some universal chord which all of us have in common. John Hughes told stories about kids, and he did this very well. Have an issue with kids, or the kid within yourself, you might not appreciate his work. It’s okay, your decision. Still, this is a universal experience, being a kid, whatever culture. It is whatever you want it to be. That’s our power. That is the human imagination. 

We can get into sucky mud when we watch the Academy Awards. Quicksand that sucks away our imagination sometimes. It’s not where we are now, it’s how much we want to be where we want to go, and to do this we must, not recreate the past, but create our future. I might be a gum sucking Okie, or a white bread New England politician, or a wacky smoking Californian, the bottom line is still the same.

I found the Academy Awards interesting for two reasons:

The first is that Avatar did not win, yet was/is one of the highest grossing films in history.

Second, while people comment on how boring or mishandled the awards show was, film is story driven, so it’s not what happens in the story, it’s what you want to happen. Since all our stories are about us, and because they are all about where we are right now, you are asked to look once again into the mirror, to look at yourself. This is righteous, truly is. Strip away the judgement and you come up with people dealing with racial oppression that has been happening for over a century, a woman who fights racial oppression out of the kindness of her heart, a man who has been literally hurt and is trying to work through the pain, a woman who learns the importance of food, and a recreation of war.

Right now, trillions, yes, not millions of dollars are being funneled into our presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is a fact. And the unemployed are awaiting some decision from the government on where to find the funds to continue their support. We’ve seen this before in a different context. So look at these movies, film stories. Each and every one speaks to our current situation. 

If we are to ever be different, better at being who we are than what we have been, we need reminders and pointers. This is difficult, because we each must decide “what is better” and “who are we.” We can use logic, our brains, we can use our hearts. Or we can use both. 

Great stories repeat themselves. The more things change, the more they are the same. I’ve been hurt, very hurt. I have no desire to see more disabling of explosives than I’ve done myself. Avatar inspires me, and somehow takes away a bit of the pain of the war we seem to do repeatedly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging is a poor substitute for appreciation. These films are stories about us. They describe you and me, whether you like it or not. They are mirrors, as all stories are. They reflect back to us not only our current situation, but some possibilities for the future. Film stories ask us to decide, not judge.</p>
<p>I took a film course many years ago that taught me about the eclectic nature of the film medium. Color, texture, movement, form, structure, language, music, so many elements to use in self-expression, to tell a story. Film leveled the playing ground and upped the ante, for it qualified all the criticisms directed at the other media that preceded it – literature, painting, photography, sculpture, even architecture. We want to know the truth about ourselves, want answers to our questions, want something so real and close to us that it perhaps takes less effort to solve our problems. I hope, whoever you are, you want to know more about your life, and aren’t too sure that you have all the answers. No one film does, just as no one person in your life does. You find the answers to your questions, with help. So it becomes how open a person is to possibilities, and this requires imagination.</p>
<p>The most salient (meaningful) comment I’ve ever read about acting is that the great actors are honest. Simply that. And regarding stories, not just through film, is that they are great when they touch some universal chord which all of us have in common. John Hughes told stories about kids, and he did this very well. Have an issue with kids, or the kid within yourself, you might not appreciate his work. It’s okay, your decision. Still, this is a universal experience, being a kid, whatever culture. It is whatever you want it to be. That’s our power. That is the human imagination. </p>
<p>We can get into sucky mud when we watch the Academy Awards. Quicksand that sucks away our imagination sometimes. It’s not where we are now, it’s how much we want to be where we want to go, and to do this we must, not recreate the past, but create our future. I might be a gum sucking Okie, or a white bread New England politician, or a wacky smoking Californian, the bottom line is still the same.</p>
<p>I found the Academy Awards interesting for two reasons:</p>
<p>The first is that Avatar did not win, yet was/is one of the highest grossing films in history.</p>
<p>Second, while people comment on how boring or mishandled the awards show was, film is story driven, so it’s not what happens in the story, it’s what you want to happen. Since all our stories are about us, and because they are all about where we are right now, you are asked to look once again into the mirror, to look at yourself. This is righteous, truly is. Strip away the judgement and you come up with people dealing with racial oppression that has been happening for over a century, a woman who fights racial oppression out of the kindness of her heart, a man who has been literally hurt and is trying to work through the pain, a woman who learns the importance of food, and a recreation of war.</p>
<p>Right now, trillions, yes, not millions of dollars are being funneled into our presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is a fact. And the unemployed are awaiting some decision from the government on where to find the funds to continue their support. We’ve seen this before in a different context. So look at these movies, film stories. Each and every one speaks to our current situation. </p>
<p>If we are to ever be different, better at being who we are than what we have been, we need reminders and pointers. This is difficult, because we each must decide “what is better” and “who are we.” We can use logic, our brains, we can use our hearts. Or we can use both. </p>
<p>Great stories repeat themselves. The more things change, the more they are the same. I’ve been hurt, very hurt. I have no desire to see more disabling of explosives than I’ve done myself. Avatar inspires me, and somehow takes away a bit of the pain of the war we seem to do repeatedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaun</title>
		<link>http://new.blog.imdb.net/2010/03/08/putting-the-hurt-on-avatar-a-quick-look-at-the-82nd-annual-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-5470</link>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.blog.imdb.net/?p=1008#comment-5470</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-5431&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5431&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bonzo Grape&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
          Hurt(in) Locker was a TERRIBLE movie.  Not even CLOSE to best of anything – except maybe Best DVD to throw in the trash.
A very poor overall film.
Where was Star Trek ??????  Or can’t the Academy acknowledge pop movies.  They blew off Dark Knight last year.  Both of these movies are well over 100 times better than Hurt (in) Locker.
         &lt;/blockquote&gt;

well said !!! Hurt Locker is just a piece of garbage !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-5431"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-5431" rel="nofollow">Bonzo Grape</a> :</strong><br />
          Hurt(in) Locker was a TERRIBLE movie.  Not even CLOSE to best of anything – except maybe Best DVD to throw in the trash.<br />
A very poor overall film.<br />
Where was Star Trek ??????  Or can’t the Academy acknowledge pop movies.  They blew off Dark Knight last year.  Both of these movies are well over 100 times better than Hurt (in) Locker.
         </p></blockquote>
<p>well said !!! Hurt Locker is just a piece of garbage !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twan</title>
		<link>http://new.blog.imdb.net/2010/03/08/putting-the-hurt-on-avatar-a-quick-look-at-the-82nd-annual-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-5440</link>
		<dc:creator>Twan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.blog.imdb.net/?p=1008#comment-5440</guid>
		<description>I have the feeling that the academy members lost touch with the audience. 2,5 Billion vs 14 Million. Yeah, the public definitely liked the Hurt Locker more, that&#039;s why they ALL went to the cinema to see this movie. 
Rediculous winner!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the feeling that the academy members lost touch with the audience. 2,5 Billion vs 14 Million. Yeah, the public definitely liked the Hurt Locker more, that&#8217;s why they ALL went to the cinema to see this movie.<br />
Rediculous winner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonzo Grape</title>
		<link>http://new.blog.imdb.net/2010/03/08/putting-the-hurt-on-avatar-a-quick-look-at-the-82nd-annual-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-5431</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonzo Grape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.blog.imdb.net/?p=1008#comment-5431</guid>
		<description>Hurt(in) Locker was a TERRIBLE movie.  Not even CLOSE to best of anything - except maybe Best DVD to throw in the trash.

A very poor overall film.

Where was Star Trek ??????  Or can&#039;t the Academy acknowledge pop movies.  They blew off Dark Knight last year.  Both of these movies are well over 100 times better than Hurt (in) Locker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurt(in) Locker was a TERRIBLE movie.  Not even CLOSE to best of anything &#8211; except maybe Best DVD to throw in the trash.</p>
<p>A very poor overall film.</p>
<p>Where was Star Trek ??????  Or can&#8217;t the Academy acknowledge pop movies.  They blew off Dark Knight last year.  Both of these movies are well over 100 times better than Hurt (in) Locker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Phillips</title>
		<link>http://new.blog.imdb.net/2010/03/08/putting-the-hurt-on-avatar-a-quick-look-at-the-82nd-annual-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-5429</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.blog.imdb.net/?p=1008#comment-5429</guid>
		<description>In my opinion there were only six films that came out last year that people will remember and celebrate in years to come.
1.The Hurt Locker
2.Avatar (strictly for it visual prowess and technical achievment).
3.(500) Days of Summer (will mark the emergence of Marc Webb)
4.Inglorious Basterds
5.Up in the air
6.Fantastic Mr. Fox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion there were only six films that came out last year that people will remember and celebrate in years to come.<br />
1.The Hurt Locker<br />
2.Avatar (strictly for it visual prowess and technical achievment).<br />
3.(500) Days of Summer (will mark the emergence of Marc Webb)<br />
4.Inglorious Basterds<br />
5.Up in the air<br />
6.Fantastic Mr. Fox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Phillips</title>
		<link>http://new.blog.imdb.net/2010/03/08/putting-the-hurt-on-avatar-a-quick-look-at-the-82nd-annual-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-5427</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.blog.imdb.net/?p=1008#comment-5427</guid>
		<description>The Oscars wre pretty bad this year.  Not only was the telecast dull, the winners were not exactly correct.  Reitman should have got the screenplay award as should have Inglorious Basterds.  Other than that they were pretty good.  The White Ribbon should have won though.  Actually the best part of the show was the dance interpretation to the musical scores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Oscars wre pretty bad this year.  Not only was the telecast dull, the winners were not exactly correct.  Reitman should have got the screenplay award as should have Inglorious Basterds.  Other than that they were pretty good.  The White Ribbon should have won though.  Actually the best part of the show was the dance interpretation to the musical scores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shining</title>
		<link>http://new.blog.imdb.net/2010/03/08/putting-the-hurt-on-avatar-a-quick-look-at-the-82nd-annual-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-5409</link>
		<dc:creator>shining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.blog.imdb.net/?p=1008#comment-5409</guid>
		<description>can anybody answer my question that why The hurt locker got nominated in 2010 when the film was made and released in 2008??????????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can anybody answer my question that why The hurt locker got nominated in 2010 when the film was made and released in 2008??????????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://new.blog.imdb.net/2010/03/08/putting-the-hurt-on-avatar-a-quick-look-at-the-82nd-annual-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-5386</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.blog.imdb.net/?p=1008#comment-5386</guid>
		<description>I remember when I used to love watching the Oscars!  I believe it was in the 60s and 70s. They&#039;d do a terrific job in every category--costume, writing, film editing.  

I think the problem is the movies.  The wrong ones are being nominated.  The ones nominated are the best of a poor batch. The actors just aren&#039;t as strong as they once were.  

Steve Martin &amp; Alec Baldwin made me laugh out loud!  They were hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when I used to love watching the Oscars!  I believe it was in the 60s and 70s. They&#8217;d do a terrific job in every category&#8211;costume, writing, film editing.  </p>
<p>I think the problem is the movies.  The wrong ones are being nominated.  The ones nominated are the best of a poor batch. The actors just aren&#8217;t as strong as they once were.  </p>
<p>Steve Martin &amp; Alec Baldwin made me laugh out loud!  They were hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elle</title>
		<link>http://new.blog.imdb.net/2010/03/08/putting-the-hurt-on-avatar-a-quick-look-at-the-82nd-annual-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-5378</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.blog.imdb.net/?p=1008#comment-5378</guid>
		<description>Bring back Hugh Jackman, this show was crying out for some class. Steve Martin is a jerk. Better to have Alec alone; he seemed subdued, and the 2 of them were very boring as a team. Every year it&#039;s too long - they need to find someone who knows how to edit, make it snappy - they need to eliminate some categories (short films - how many viewers really see those?); not from getting awards, just from the telecast. The dance #s were awful - even NP Harris, who is actually talented. Most of all - LOSE the nastiness; the vulgar jokes, cheap shots, mean-spirited comments that miss their mark for laughs. It&#039;s supposed to be Hollywood&#039;s biggest night - it should be a class act; speaking of which: CONGRATUALTIONS KATHRYN BIGELOW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring back Hugh Jackman, this show was crying out for some class. Steve Martin is a jerk. Better to have Alec alone; he seemed subdued, and the 2 of them were very boring as a team. Every year it&#8217;s too long &#8211; they need to find someone who knows how to edit, make it snappy &#8211; they need to eliminate some categories (short films &#8211; how many viewers really see those?); not from getting awards, just from the telecast. The dance #s were awful &#8211; even NP Harris, who is actually talented. Most of all &#8211; LOSE the nastiness; the vulgar jokes, cheap shots, mean-spirited comments that miss their mark for laughs. It&#8217;s supposed to be Hollywood&#8217;s biggest night &#8211; it should be a class act; speaking of which: CONGRATUALTIONS KATHRYN BIGELOW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

