Cannes 2010: A Preview


We'll be covering the festival live from Cannes starting May 12, 2010.

The last time I was at the Cannes Film Festival (okay, it’s pretty great to be able to start a post that way) was 2003. Though anti-American sentiment was high and the invasion of Iraq was recent, the French were welcoming, gracious and kind. The festival, however, was a bit back on its heels.

Attendance appeared to be down as the world was still getting its breath back from the events of the last 18 months. The then co-chairman of Miramax films, Harvey Weinstein, in an article in the ultra swanky, now-defunct Variety VLife magazine, questioned the viability of the festival.  Sour journalists, and critics from print media picked up the comment and echoed the sentiment, neither Weinstein nor the pundits apparently realizing that the mortality that they needed to worry about was their own.

The big controversy that year was over Vincent Gallo’s The Brown Bunny, a soporific, self-indulgent film that infamously featured Chloe Sevigny fellating Gallo. The film was so boring, and so bad that Roger Ebert, who had walked out of the screening, hyperbolically proclaimed it “the worst film ever shown in the history of Cannes” to a camera crew that had pounced on him. In response Gallo called Ebert “a fat pig” and flippantly wished cancer upon the critic. Mr. Ebert, borrowing from Churchill, replied: “One day I will be thin; Mr Gallo will still be the director of The Brown Bunny.” Ironically, tragically, Ebert was diagnosed with thyroid cancer two years later.  By that time Gallo had also cut 26 minutes from Bunny and Mr. Ebert had revisited it, giving the film a much warmer reception for its director’s efforts. Recently Ebert, after considerable trials, regained his voice with prolific posts while Gallo appeared in Francis Ford Coppola’s Tetro. Though the film was a 71-year-old’s version of experimental Gallo showed he still had the acting chops that intrigued everyone years before.

The hottest ticket in Cannes in 2003 was the premiere of The Matrix Reloaded which debuted on May 15th, prompting Keanu Reeves and cast to hit the Croissette and red carpet to the Palais de Festival.

In another irony, Reloaded’s debut was the same day as “European Day” at Cannes where the cultural ministers from the European Union (EU) announced that the EU intended to invest upwards of $400 million in films made by filmmakers principally from the EU. The goal? To “preserve our culture,” said an informed source, “from the strong influx of American product.”

That strong influx has not ebbed a bit. Universal and Ridley Scott’s Robin Hood kick off Cannes this year while Tim Adler, in Deadline Hollywood Daily’s recent article revealed that 67% of all European ticket sales went to American studio product in 2009.  It makes one wonder: wither the $400 mil?

The film’s fighting it out In Competition in 2003 included Clint Eastwood’s Mystic River, Denys Arcand’s The Barbarian Invasions, Lars von Trier’s Dogville, and Elephant which Gus Van Sant directed to the Palme d’Or.

This year, it’s the return of favorites such as Abbas Kiarostami (Copie Conforme), Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu (Biutiful), Mike Leigh (Another Year), Doug Liman (Fair Game) and Bertrand Tavernier (La Princesse de Montpensier).    But most of these films, besides their name directors and their anointing by Cannes, are mysteries and we’ll have to wait to see what the next week brings to see which be written about in blogs seven years from now, reflecting on 2010.

  1. #1 by Camere video - May 10th, 2010 at 01:15

    Frankly, i think Cannes Festival should be only for the Europeans. At the Americans Movie Awards or Festivals you don’t see to many movies from foreign countries…

    Anyhow, i just finished Coelho’s last book about Cannes and i decided to not be interested anymore about celebrities and their personal life. Media is just to toxic for human brain… Movies are a part of the 7th art!

  2. #2 by E.N.Stinson - May 10th, 2010 at 17:42

    If I had $400 million, I’d stick close to home and make movies in South and North Carolina for the rest of my life. Even $4 million would be a great start.

    >hint<

  3. #3 by Denise - May 10th, 2010 at 23:50

    I agree with the above poster. I am American and I think with the flooding of American blockbuster films at Cannes, Europeans films and unfamiliar actors are overshadowed.. the truth be told the European films are much more interesting in content and offer more brilliant performances by actors/actresses that we in America rarely see because they aren’t the major A list Hollywood stars we see in the tabloids…I don’t mind reading about the glitzy parties but keep the festival free of mindless big budget American blockbuster films. They only have them there because American stars will show up on the red carpet.

  4. #4 by Stephanie - May 11th, 2010 at 14:49

    @Camere video: By “only for the Europeans” I assume you just mean not American, right? You wouldn’t mind if there were films from Africa, Australia or Asia, I assume.

    To correct you, you see lots of foreign films at both American awards shows and festivals.

    @Denise:”I think with the flooding of American blockbuster films at Cannes…” That’s a bit of an overstatement. Last year, “Up” and “Inglourious Basterds” were the only major American films at Cannes. I would argue that both deserved to be there. When films like “The Matrix Reloaded” or “Star Wars” show at Cannes, it’s for publicity. It’s not like they are competing with smaller films for the Palm d’Or. Like it or not, these films will get some people to read about the festival and take a look at what’s getting buzz there. “A Prophet,” one of the favorites of Cannes 2009, is currently doing quite well in the states.

  5. #5 by James Abdou - May 12th, 2010 at 16:15

    I think some of these comments are outrageous. It is a film festival – The geography does not take sovereign over the art. Prejudice to the American market is born of an obvious imbalance regarding the size and wealth of the industry. Cannes is a pivotal and integral field of recognition for any filmmaker. What is showcased at the festival is selected to create awareness and appreciation for the work that the pioneers of the film industry are producing. The likes or dislikes are subjective. It is fact that It is thanks to the American market that audiences all over the world can enjoy the audio visual experience and have been for the greater part of a century.

    I am in fact British and I love film. I would never boycott or attempt to inhibit the production or influence of film from any region. I aspire to one day have my own film produced as I have a growing collection of feature screenplay’s under my belt. I am just looking for somebody in the right place to read them. As an artist and a film maker, I just want to make my movies. It doesn’t matter who or where I get the funding from. Europe/Americas/Far East. We aspire to create, we aspire to deliver an experience, we aspire to voice a message, with this wonderful expression. And we want as many people to hear our voice and experience our art and enjoy our spectacles. Money and profitability is a priority and a bonus. This is a business.

  6. #6 by gisha8 - May 14th, 2010 at 00:02

    i think abas kiarostamy can be star in cannes 2010.or can be one of the stars this year.

  7. #7 by chantal - May 24th, 2010 at 03:22

    One more thing I have been working part time at the calgary blockbuster should hear what most customer’s comment did you know that if someone does NOT like an actor ( actress ) they will NOT rent the movie or even less go see it at the cinema interesting isn’t it.. I am glad that we are finally opening our eyes and see the diiference between and world cinema who is now finally taking a great place in our culture
    Well done Holliwood

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Comments are closed.