The Official Blog of IMDb
Header

Two Imposters, One of Them Can Stay

January 25th, 2012 | Posted by arno in Sundance Film Festival

Still from Compliance

 

Compliance has earned wildly mixed reviews here at Sundance, and I feel it’s successful for that reason alone, even though it’s a filthy piece of work.

The drama puts the employees of a fast food restaurant through an incredible scenario orchestrated by a prank caller. Posing as a police officer, he contacts the store manager and makes her an unwitting ally in a plot against a pretty cashier, whom he accuses of stealing money from a customer’s purse. The manager quarantines the young woman, and for the remaining duration of the film she is subjected to a series of dehumanizing acts illustrate how some bend to the will of others without true resistance.

I think writer-director Craig Zobel slips up by placing value judgments on his characters, especially in the film’s coda. And the lurid camerawork is as sleazy as the true events that inform Zobel’s work. This is especially questionable and perhaps short-sighted filmmaking from a guy who has worked with David Gordon Green from George Washington through Undertow.

Still from The Imposter

More successful is The Imposter, an immersive missing person documentary that reveals one person’s fraud and one family’s potential crime and cover up.

13-year-old Nicholas Barclay vanished from his San Antonio neighborhood in 1994. Some three years later, a young man in Spain materialized, claiming to be Nicholas. We’re introduced to this man, Frédéric Bourdin, at the beginning of The Imposter, and he guides us through how he duped authorities on both sides of the Atlantic and was accepted by the Barclay family as being Nicholas.

Keep in mind that Nicholas was a blonde haired, blue-eyed boy with a small frame at the time of his disappearance, and Frédéric, who was in his early 20s when he posed as the boy, was a Frenchman who bleached his dark hair the day he was reunited with his would-be sister and had three small tattoos inked on him according to Nicholas’ missing person report.

Wait, a tattooed 13-year-old boy?

That’s when I felt a greater sense of curiosity and suspicion about the Barclay family history, and director Bart Layton does a fantastic job at balancing Frédéric’s amoral deception with a sense of Nicholas’ true fate; he even lassos in a private eye who provides bits of welcome comic relief as he takes up the case against the Barclays.

A&E IndieFilms is behind the work, which plays like a superior TV documentary. That’s a polite way of saying I’m surprised this was programmed at a top-ranking film festival, but it is definitely worth seeing as Nicholas’ case remains open.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

4 Responses

  • Matt says:

    I disagree with you about Compliance. I thought the movie was well-made and that it was capably directed. I think the subject matter of the film is difficult and required care on Zobel’s part to avoid slipping into the territory of exploitation. I think he achieved that goal. The nudity was necessary to the script, but in my view was handled in a way to make the audience feel disgust and not titillation. The most shocking parts of the story (which, apparently, were based on the real incident) were handled with discretion. Mr. Zobel had to walk a fine line here, and I think he did so admirably.

    One point on which we do agree is that the film’s epilogue / coda was unnecessary, at least insofar as the filmmaker judged the manager / Sandra character. If the point of the movie is to try to understand the odd aspect of human behavior that compels us to respect authority, even in situations in which our common sense should tell us not to, then implicitly criticizing the manager seems counter to that goal.

  • arno says:

    Hey Matt — Your take on the film is valid. I wouldn’t rule out another Compliance screening down the road – you know how opinions can change. An example from last year: Take Shelter didn’t impress me in the least, then it lingered after the festival, and I saw it again during its theatrical release and had a different take on it. Put simply, Compliance is a success to me because it generates discussion. Thanks for your thoughts on it.

  • Lee B. says:

    Well, I’m definitely interested in checking out ‘Compliance’ now despite any mixed reviews.
    There was a great episode of Law & Order: SVU with Robin Williams that used the same true events as its foundation a couple of years ago.

  • arno says:

    Lee, I think chances are good for a distribution deal. Another press screening was just added. Stay tuned….